|
Bill Blass' Comments
Comments regarding the NGI initiative to the Presidential Advisory Committee
|
|
|
Bill Blass, Professor of Physics,
University of Tennessee, Knoxville
|
|
|
Thank you for allowing me to address the group this afternoon. I am Bill
Blass, Professor of Physics at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
I also serve as Senior Consultant to the Director of Telecommunications
and Network Services, Division of Information Infrastructure. In the
past I also served as the Associate Director for Research of the
University Computing Center.
|
|
|
The first issue involves AUP's (Acceptable Use Policies). We are all
aware that AUP's are necessary for orderly utilization of networks and I
have no argument with AUP's . I do encourage the Advisory Council to
consider recommending some way to encourage and enable University -
Federal Agency cooperation and experimentation by, perhaps, enabling
easing of AUP restrictions on a case by case basis. In order to
facilitate and encourage research and experimentation between
Universities and Federal agencies, we must change the mindset which
simply discounts the possibility of shared network connections because
of AUP restrictions. In the context of NGI, it should not take heroic
efforts to achieve rather simple cooperative activities in pursuit of
creative synergy.
|
|
|
A second issue is also related to AUP's but less directly.
Interoperability between I2, ESnet, NREN, etc. must be an early goal of
NGI. This interoperability is needed as early as possible in order to
facilitate the NGI experimental research in R&E networking. Most of my
peers need high bandwidth connectivity to ESnet and NREN primary sites
and if they are to participate in the networking research by providing
the application drivers, then the time for interoperability is early
rather than late. Once again, narrowly drawn AUP's or insular network
attitudes will preclude successful synergistic University- Federal
agency activities in support of NGI. Once again, narrowly drawn AUP's
can exacerbate the situation.
|
|
|
Returning to the first issue, I'd like to relate what we are doing at
Tennessee in collaboration with ORNL. The University of Tennessee at
Knoxville and Oak Ridge National Laboratory have a long history of
cooperation. At present UTK and ORNL are OC3 connected and with the
expected implementation of an appropriate BGP at the ORNL end of the
link, all of the UTK - ESnet primary site traffic will flow over the OC3
pipe. In this same vein, we are discussing with SEPSCOR the possibility
of cross connecting UTK with SEPSCOR at Knoxville. A primary benefit of
this cross linking would be making ESnet access available to SEPSCOR
sites over the UTK-ORNL OCS3 link. Further synergistic sharing of
resource such as the sharing of an OC3 or even OC12 Knoxville - Atlanta
link carrying ESnet, vBNS, and I2 traffic is complicated on one hand by
the broadly drawn ESnet AUP. We know that there are ways to breech the
obstacles but it is my position that NGI supporting research activity
should not require heroic efforts on the part of the players.
|
|
|
Ladies and Gentlemen, thank you for your interest and attention.
|