| |
|
| |
Participation in Federal NITRD Activities
|
| |
|
The following are criteria developed by the multiagency IT research
program that agencies
considering participation can use to assess whether their research
activities fit the NITRD profile.
|
| |
NITRD Goals
|
| |
|
Assure continued U.S. leadership in computing, information, and
communications technologies to meet Federal goals and to support
U.S. 21st century academic, industrial, and government interests
Accelerate deployment of advanced and experimental information
technologies to maintain world leadership in science, engineering,
and mathematics; improve the quality of life; promote long-term
economic growth; increase lifelong learning; protect the environment;
harness information technology; and enhance national security
Advance U.S. productivity and industrial competitiveness through
long-term scientific and engineering research in computing, information,
and communications technologies
|
| |
Evaluation Criteria for Participation
|
| |
|
Relevance/Contribution
|
| |
|
The research must significantly contribute to the overall goals
of Federal Networking and Information Technology Research and Development
(NITRD), which includes the goals of the seven Program Component
Areas - High End Computing Infrastructure and Applications (HEC
I&A), High End Computing Research and Development (HEC R&D),
Human Computer Interaction and Information Management (HCI &
IM), Large Scale Networking (LSN), Software Design and Productivity
(SDP), High Confidence Software and Systems (HCSS), and Social,
Economic, and Workforce Implications of Information Technology and
Information Technology Workforce Development (SEW) - to enable solution
of Grand Challenge- and National Challenge-class applications problems. |
| |
|
Technical/Scientific Merit
|
| |
|
The proposed agency program must be technically/scientifically
sound and of high quality and must be the product of a documented
technical/scientific planning and review process. |
| |
|
Readiness
|
| |
|
A clear agency planning process must be evident, and the organization
must have demonstrated capability to carry out the program.
|
| |
|
Timeliness
|
| |
|
The proposed work must be technically/scientifically timely for
one or more of the multiagency research endeavor's Program Component
Areas.
|
| |
|
Linkages
|
| |
|
The responsible organization must have established policies, programs,
and activities promoting effective technical and scientific connections
among government, industry, and academic sectors.
|
| |
|
Costs
|
| |
|
The identified resources must be adequate, represent an appropriate
share of the total available R&D resources (e.g., a balance
among Program Component Areas), promote prospects for coordinated
or joint funding, and address long-term resource implications.
|
| |
|
Agency Approval
|
| |
|
The proposed program or activity must have policy-level approval
by the submitting agency.
|