• Big Data
    Interagency Working Group
    (BD IWG)

    The Big Data Interagency Working Group (BD IWG) works to facilitate and further the goals of the White House Big Data R&D Initiative.

    BigData
  • Cyber Physical Systems Interagency Working Group (CPS IWG)

    The CPS IWG is to coordinate programs, budgets, and policy recommendations for Cyber Physical Systems (CPS) research and development (R&D).

    CPS
  • Cyber Security and Information Assurance Interagency Working Group (CSIA IWG)

    Cyber Security and Information Assurance (CSIA) Interagency Working Group coordinates the activities of the CSIA Program Component Area.

    CSIA
  • Health IT R&D
    Interagency Working Group

    The Health Information Technology Research and Development Interagency Working Group coordinates programs, budgets and policy recommendations for Health IT R&D.

    healthitrd
  • Human Computer Interaction & Information Management Interagency Working Group (HCI&IM IWG)

    HCI&IM focuses on information interaction, integration, and management research to develop and measure the performance of new technologies.

    hciim
  • High Confidence Software & Systems Interagency Working Group (HCSS IWG)

    HCSS R&D supports development of scientific foundations and enabling software and hardware technologies for the engineering, verification and validation, assurance, and certification of complex, networked, distributed computing systems and cyber-physical systems (CPS).

    hcss
  • High End Computing Interagency Working Group (HEC IWG)

    The HEC IWG coordinates the activities of the High End Computing (HEC) Infrastructure and Applications (I&A) and HEC Research and Development (R&D) Program Component Areas (PCAs).

    hec
  • Large Scale Networking Interagency Working Group
    (LSN IWG)

    LSN members coordinate Federal agency networking R&D in leading-edge networking technologies, services, and enhanced performance.

    lsn
  • Software Productivity, Sustainability, and Quality Interagency Working Group (SPSQ IWG)

    The purpose of the SPSQ IWG is to coordinate the R&D efforts across agencies that transform the frontiers of software science and engineering and to identify R&D areas in need of development that span the science and the technology of software creation and sustainment.

    sdp
  • Video and Image Analytics
    Interagency Working Group (VIA IWG)

    Formed to ensure and maximize successful coordination and collaboration across the Federal government in the important and growing area of video and image analytics

    VIA CG
  • Wireless Spectrum Research and Development Interagency Working Group (WSRD IWG)

    The Wireless Spectrum R&D (WSRD) Interagency Working Group (IWG) has been formed to coordinate spectrum-related research and development activities across the Federal government.

    WSRD

Federal - Commercial Spectrum Data

From NITRDGROUPS
Jump to: navigation, search

  • Wireless Spectrum
    Research and Development
    (WSRD)

    WSRD SSG Workshop VI
    Federal - Commercial Spectrum Data:
    Understanding Information Exchange Needs, Issues and Approaches
    October 21, 2014
    National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA


    WSRD SSG: Federal-Commercial Spectrum Data

Federal - Commercial Spectrum Data:

Understanding Information Exchange Needs, Issues and Approaches

October 21, 2014

National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA




Federal - Commercial Spectrum Data:Understanding Information Exchange Needs, Issues and Approaches



Synopsis

The NTIA and the FCC are increasing their efforts to identify and make available new spectral bands with the understanding that this will necessitate the use of spectrum sharing techniques. To ensure success, it is critical to first determine the spectrum data requirements of the stakeholders in order to create new policy and develop new techniques and procedures for dynamic spectrum usage. The Presidential Memorandum, Expanding America’s Leadership in Wireless Innovation, released on June 14, 2013, directed the implementation of “policies for sharing with authorized non-federal parties of classified, sensitive, or proprietary data regarding assignments, utilization of spectrum, system configurations, business plans, and other information”. The Presidential Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) released a report in July 2012 that advocated setting up Spectrum Access System (SAS) databases, with a uniform interface analogous to the Internet’s Domain Naming System (DNS), to provide federal information and access restrictions.


Dynamic information sharing and management creates innovative opportunities in many areas including network and business intelligence, devices, applications, public safety operations and security; but developing the next generation of spectrum management tools is complex. It requires consensus among stakeholders on several important issues such as: the purpose of collecting and sharing information, the type and minimal amount of data needed, how to get it into the SAS, the necessary level of security, and enforcement.


To provide a forum for this conversation, the Wireless Spectrum Research and Development Senior Steering Group (WSRD SSG) will hold a workshop, Federal-Commercial Spectrum Data: Understanding Information Exchange Needs, Issues, and Approaches, on October 21, 2014, from 8:00 AM to 5:30PM, at the National Science Foundation facility, in Arlington, VA. Information gathered from this workshop will be used by the WSRD SSG to develop recommendations for the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP).


Workshop Goals


Workshop Session Descriptions

Session I: Collecting and Sharing Data: Purpose, Uses, and Issues

Information sharing is essential to developing robust spectrum sharing solutions. Just as the availability of characteristic radar waveforms spurred on the development of DFS technology, new information exchanges are needed to permit innovators to better evaluate opportunities and optimize systems for spectrum sharing. These information exchanges range from the general information in NTIA’s Spectrum Inventory to detailed systems characteristics exchanged during the recent CSMAC working groups meetings.


All stakeholders agree on the need for shared information to explore designs, conduct studies, and develop systems; key research questions include the following:


Session II: Data Sharing and Obfuscation: State-of-the-art Technologies and Research Needs

As described in Session I, an effective spectrum sharing system will rely on the ability to share relevant spectrum data. However, federal and commercial users have a legitimate need to protect critical spectrum data from disclosure. A fundamental research need is the development of techniques that can protect critical information while enabling useful spectrum sharing processes. In considering this research challenge, two types of data need protection: system data, such as technical equipment characteristics; and operational data, such as system location, operating frequencies, and power.


Key research questions include the following:


Session III: Security of Data Storage, Access and Real-time Delivery: Issues, Framework, and Obstacles

Traditional IT data solutions have well segregated physical, logical, and personnel controls. Shared spectrum data services will require that the application software and databases move to large common data centers. This poses security challenges for many stakeholders. Resolving these issues will involve adopting common frameworks, standards, protocols, procedures, and policies. Data security has always been an important element of quality of service; however, unlike traditional IT data solutions, spectrum data will need to work across federal and commercial systems while maintaining secure data creation, translation, update and deletion.

Key research questions include the following:


Session IV: Enforcement, Building Trust, and Win-Win Collaboration: Principles, Framework, and Next Steps

The key to successful spectrum sharing is providing a framework that is mutually beneficial for all parties. To achieve the necessary flow of information between commercial and federal users, a framework also requires transparency, trust, and effectiveness of enforcement.

Key questions include the following:


Workshop Planning Committee

References and Resources